Skip to content

post modernism generator

June 16, 2010

generated by http://www.elsewhere.org/pomo/

Surrealism and Batailleist `powerful communication’

V. Charles la Fournier
Department of Sociology, University of California, Berkeley

Helmut Reicher
Department of English, Miskatonic University, Arkham, Mass.

//
//

1. Contexts of defining characteristic

In the works of Rushdie, a predominant concept is the concept of textual narrativity. But if the neodialectic paradigm of consensus holds, we have to choose between surrealism and deconstructivist predialectic theory. Batailleist `powerful communication’ suggests that discourse is a product of communication.

“Consciousness is impossible,” says Debord. In a sense, the subject is contextualised into a neodialectic paradigm of consensus that includes reality as a totality. Bataille’s critique of surrealism states that academe is capable of deconstruction, given that art is equal to culture.

In the works of Rushdie, a predominant concept is the distinction between feminine and masculine. Thus, the characteristic theme of the works of Rushdie is the difference between sexual identity and narrativity. Pickett[1] implies that we have to choose between the neodialectic paradigm of consensus and patriarchial narrative.

If one examines Batailleist `powerful communication’, one is faced with a choice: either reject the neodialectic paradigm of consensus or conclude that society has objective value. It could be said that any number of situationisms concerning a self-supporting paradox exist. The primary theme of Finnis’s[2] model of Derridaist reading is not desublimation, but predesublimation.

The main theme of the works of Gaiman is a mythopoetical whole. In a sense, the premise of surrealism suggests that consensus must come from the masses, but only if Bataille’s critique of Batailleist `powerful communication’ is invalid. The subject is interpolated into a neodialectic paradigm of consensus that includes art as a reality.

However, if Batailleist `powerful communication’ holds, the works of Gaiman are postmodern. The premise of material nihilism holds that reality is part of the paradigm of sexuality.

Therefore, Lyotard uses the term ‘Batailleist `powerful communication” to denote the defining characteristic, and some would say the failure, of neoconstructivist class. Foucault’s essay on the neodialectic paradigm of consensus suggests that context comes from the collective unconscious, given that truth is distinct from art.

However, in The Books of Magic, Gaiman deconstructs Batailleist `powerful communication’; in Neverwhere, although, he denies the neodialectic paradigm of consensus. Marx suggests the use of Batailleist `powerful communication’ to challenge class divisions.

Thus, the subject is contextualised into a surrealism that includes consciousness as a paradox. Lyotard promotes the use of the neodialectic paradigm of consensus to analyse and deconstruct sexual identity.

However, Batailleist `powerful communication’ holds that the collective is capable of intention. Marx suggests the use of surrealism to attack hierarchy.

But Sontag’s model of textual subdialectic theory implies that art is used to entrench sexism. The subject is interpolated into a surrealism that includes reality as a reality.

It could be said that the primary theme of Bailey’s[3] analysis of the neodialectic paradigm of consensus is a semiotic whole. Sartre uses the term ‘Batailleist `powerful communication” to denote not construction, as the neodialectic paradigm of consensus suggests, but preconstruction.

2. Subconceptualist depatriarchialism and Marxist socialism

If one examines surrealism, one is faced with a choice: either accept the material paradigm of context or conclude that the raison d’etre of the observer is significant form. But a number of theories concerning Batailleist `powerful communication’ may be found. The subject is contextualised into a surrealism that includes art as a totality.

In the works of Gaiman, a predominant concept is the concept of neodeconstructivist reality. Thus, Bataille promotes the use of Batailleist `powerful communication’ to modify society. The fatal flaw of surrealism intrinsic to Gaiman’s Death: The High Cost of Living is also evident in Sandman.

“Sexuality is intrinsically used in the service of class divisions,” says Marx. It could be said that the premise of dialectic objectivism states that consciousness is capable of deconstruction, given that Batailleist `powerful communication’ is valid. The main theme of the works of Gaiman is the role of the reader as participant.

In the works of Gaiman, a predominant concept is the distinction between without and within. Therefore, Foucault uses the term ’subcultural appropriation’ to denote a mythopoetical reality. Von Junz[4] implies that we have to choose between surrealism and dialectic rationalism.

Thus, in Midnight’s Children, Rushdie reiterates Marxist class; in Satanic Verses, however, he deconstructs Batailleist `powerful communication’. An abundance of theories concerning not, in fact, narrative, but postnarrative exist.

Therefore, Foucault uses the term ’subtextual capitalism’ to denote the stasis, and some would say the failure, of conceptual society. If Marxist socialism holds, we have to choose between Batailleist `powerful communication’ and postdialectic textual theory.

But Bataille suggests the use of surrealism to deconstruct sexism. Baudrillard’s essay on the subdialectic paradigm of discourse states that the State is part of the defining characteristic of art.

In a sense, the primary theme of Hanfkopf’s[5] model of surrealism is not deconstruction as such, but neodeconstruction. Lacan uses the term ‘Batailleist `powerful communication” to denote the common ground between narrativity and sexual identity.

It could be said that many patriarchialisms concerning surrealism may be discovered. Derrida promotes the use of premodern discourse to analyse and challenge language.

However, the destruction/creation distinction prevalent in Rushdie’s Midnight’s Children emerges again in The Ground Beneath Her Feet, although in a more cultural sense. The main theme of the works of Rushdie is not narrative, but subnarrative.

3. Expressions of collapse

“Sexual identity is dead,” says Bataille; however, according to Geoffrey[6] , it is not so much sexual identity that is dead, but rather the paradigm of sexual identity. Therefore, Foucault suggests the use of Marxist socialism to deconstruct class divisions. Surrealism suggests that society, perhaps surprisingly, has significance.

The characteristic theme of Tilton’s[7] essay on Marxist socialism is the role of the observer as artist. But an abundance of theories concerning the difference between art and class exist. Pickett[8] implies that we have to choose between Batailleist `powerful communication’ and dialectic narrative.

However, the subject is interpolated into a surrealism that includes reality as a paradox. If subsemantic objectivism holds, the works of Rushdie are reminiscent of Lynch.

Thus, the subject is contextualised into a Marxist socialism that includes language as a totality. Marx uses the term ‘Batailleist `powerful communication” to denote the role of the reader as artist.

Therefore, the primary theme of the works of Rushdie is not theory per se, but neotheory. Hamburger[9] suggests that we have to choose between surrealism and Lacanist obscurity.

Thus, many narratives concerning textual subcultural theory may be found. Marx uses the term ’surrealism’ to denote the role of the participant as writer.


1. Pickett, F. ed. (1978) Reinventing Social realism: Batailleist `powerful communication’ in the works of Gaiman. Loompanics

2. Finnis, T. Q. V. (1983) Batailleist `powerful communication’ and surrealism. Panic Button Books

3. Bailey, U. Q. ed. (1997) The Narrative of Absurdity: Surrealism in the works of Koons. Loompanics

4. von Junz, G. J. V. (1989) Surrealism in the works of Rushdie. And/Or Press

5. Hanfkopf, B. A. ed. (1971) Reassessing Realism: Surrealism and Batailleist `powerful communication’. Loompanics

6. Geoffrey, E. (1998) Batailleist `powerful communication’ and surrealism. Panic Button Books

7. Tilton, U. F. S. ed. (1980) The Absurdity of Reality: Surrealism in the works of Smith. Oxford University Press

8. Pickett, P. H. (1973) Surrealism and Batailleist `powerful communication’. O’Reilly & Associates

9. Hamburger, B. ed. (1991) The Consensus of Meaninglessness: Surrealism in the works of Gibson. Panic Button Books

Advertisements
2 Comments leave one →
  1. June 16, 2010 3:41 pm

    Great blog!

  2. June 17, 2010 7:18 am

    I was thinking: wtf? This sort of pretentious “pomo-babble” is ubiquitous in certain spheres (the academy; blog-sphere; t’internet). Then I realised it was computer generated and a small grain of optimism and hope for humanity was restored to me.

    Cheers,

    Wit

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: